I get the impression some folks think that butts are there to like... personally attack them, as if I know what hellsite is and have control over how they display our content.
The woof.group content-warning norms are already a carefully-chosen compromise in deference to a fediverse which is--let's be honest--conservative beyond the wildest dreams of Anita Bryant. Of course local norms and personal expectations vary, and that's okay! What I don't know is how to handle those subculture boundaries
Like as an admin here I could suspend federation with hellsite, but that feels silly: some of them *want* our posts! Hellsite's admins can mark woof.group content as sensitive--which is IMO entirely reasonable--but users who file remote reports like this are explicitly asking for more than that: they want our participation in enforcing their norms. Is that reasonable? Probably for some classes of content, but like... you can see people wearing only jockstraps on public sidewalks in SF and Berlin
@aphyr see, I actually think that request is more vulgar then it first appears.
The beauty of Mastodon is the granularity. For woof community the SFW filtering and the censor set up suits the needs of the community. admins of other feds can link but put a censor in place if they wish. That request however goes out of its way to try and censor a community that is otherwise minding it's own business. It's an extension of social oppression.
A social network for guys who are into hypnosis.